Muck and Mystery
   Loitering With Intent
blog - at - crumbtrail.org
March 17, 2009
The obvious

is confirmed.

Female mammals follow their noses to the right mates.

many mammal species are sexually active at night. So mammals may be less inclined than birds to base preferences on visual cues. Instead, females of many mammalian species may be more likely to choose males using olfactory cues.

Research has shown that female mammals commonly investigate scent marks left by males. Females also show a preference to mate with males who scent mark more frequently.

Just what can a female learn about a male through his scent? Plenty, say Clutton-Brock and McAuliffe.

Recent studies have shown that mammalian females use scent to pick out genetically dissimilar males. Parents with dissimilar genes in a certain part of the genome tend to produce healthier offspring. So male mammals advertise their genotype via scent, and females pick up the signal and preferentially mate with dissimilar males. This ability to sniff out a good genetic match has been found in mice and humans.

Fish health claims may cause more environmental harm than good
For years, international agencies concerned with health and nutrition have promoted seafood consumption. "Our concern is that fish stocks are under extreme pressure globally and that studies are still urgently required to define precisely who will benefit from fish oil," . . .

While many studies show healthy benefits of consuming omega-3 fatty acids, found in fish oils, some other studies fail to show significant benefits. But these negative studies are often ignored and the result is that there is increasing demand for seafood by consumers in the developed world, often at the expense of food security in developing nations. . . .

Furthermore, dietary recommendations to consume more fish are incompatible with the sustainability of ocean ecosystems.

Study gives more proof that intelligence is largely inherited
intelligence is strongly influenced by the quality of the brain's axons, or wiring that sends signals throughout the brain. The faster the signaling, the faster the brain processes information. And since the integrity of the brain's wiring is influenced by genes, the genes we inherit play a far greater role in intelligence than was previously thought.
Posted by back40 at 02:11 PM | CrumbTrails

TrackBack URL for The obvious -


Comments

The fish story sees to be another of those political rants dressed up as science. In particular, the last para of the release:
"Farley Mowat, co-author on this study, adds: "In the immediate future, human beings are going to have to find better ways to live. Our rape and pillage of the environment has to end before it becomes our end. The damage we have already done to life in the oceans is a prime example of our idiocy, and a last warning that we had better change our ways."

But the fish sustainability argument is an interesting one. So far as I am aware, "over fishing" has never caused and is unlikely to cause the loss of any species. Long before a species is threatened, it becomes uneconomical to fish them. The sustainability argument is really about maintaining a steady rate of catch - a good thing but not threatening the planet.

Posted by: Ken - Sydney at March 17, 2009 06:13 PM

Well said. It is a politicized presentation of a fairly subtle issue. I tried to ignore that part, but it's there.

There is a solid point that advocacy for increased fish consumption is not on. Even maintaining current takings is in doubt without better management. I've spoken in favor of ITQs since they make sense in theory and have shown to be effective in those places where they have been used.

The claim that omega-3 advocacy, the justification for fish oil consumption, uses available data selectively is also interesting. This gets some discussion on the grazing lists since it would be a business error to rely too heavily on shaky science for marketing materials. If your only selling point turns out to be nonsense then you have a problem. Meat and dairy from grazed animals is higher in omega-3 but we don't yet have perfect understanding of the value of omega-3.

Posted by: back40 at March 17, 2009 08:38 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?